Phạm Quang Sán’s Attempt to Revolutionize the Civil Service Exams (Khoa Cử)

In 1909, a year after he had published a textbook that was aimed at modernizing elementary education, Nguyễn Dynasty official and reformist scholar Phạm Quang Sán published another small book that was targeted at more advanced students, namely students who were studying for the civil service exams (khoa cử).

Entitled A New Selection of Policy Studies (Sách học tân tuyển 策學新選), this book purported to present model examples of the types of questions that one could expect to be asked in the exams, as well as model examples of how one should answer those questions.

Books that served as guides for answering the questions on the civil service exam were a popular genre of text. For instance, throughout the nineteenth century and continuing into the twentieth century a text known as the Collected Essays from the Palace Exam (Hội đình văn tuyển 會庭文選) which contained the actual questions from the last palace exam and either actual answers or model answers was regularly published.

So on the surface there appeared to be nothing new about Phạm Quang Sán’s book, but its content was in fact revolutionary, as it provided questions and answers for topics that were not anything like the questions and answers on the actual exams at that time.

hoidinh1

The first question, for instance, requested that exam candidates talk about the history of Occidental (Thái Tây 泰西) expansion into Asia (Á Châu 亞洲) and to discuss what kind of foreign relations policy (ngoại giao chính sách 外交政策) should be employed to deal with the West. The model answer provides an extremely detailed answer about the rise of the West, and the history of Western expansion into Asia.

There is a question about civilization (văn minh 文明), which asks if civilization is something that is territorial or is developed among human societies, and that if Asia is civilized, then why is it not at the level of development of Europe and America.

Another question asks about the history of Buddhism in Vietnam. It ends by noting that adherence to religions leads to conflicts among the people, and asks how this problem can be alleviated.

Yet, another question cites the (Confucian) classic, the Doctrine of the Mean (Tung Dung 中庸), as saying that “the cultivation of the Way is called instruction (tu đạo chi vị giáo 修道之謂教), and asks that exam candidates explain what this means. The question then notes that Westerners teach students in schools. The question then goes on to say that in recent years many schools had been set up in Vietnam in an effort to become more civilized, but asks why it is that progress (tiến bộ 進步) towards civilization has been so slow.

page1

There are many other questions like this in this small book, and as my recent posts on the 1910 exam demonstrate, the questions and answers in this book were not at all like the actual questions and answers on the civil service exam at that time.

What Phạm Quang Sán was doing here was not actually trying to teach students how to pass the civil service exam, but instead, how to revolutionize the civil service exams and society as a whole.

This was impressive. The civil service examination system was criticized by reformers throughout East Asia in the early twentieth century as an extremely conservative force that held back reform and progress (new concepts that they had learned from the West). The approach of most reformers, from Liang Qichao to Phan Bội Châu, was to break away from the world of the exams and to promote their ideas elsewhere.

Phạm Quang Sán, by contrast, tried to take reformist ideas to the heart of the exam world and make a direct effort to transform the ideas of the most conservative members of the educated elite in Vietnam.

That was revolutionary.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
An Vinh
An Vinh
9 years ago

This comment is irrelevant to the post, but I just want to point out that you used the Simplified character 学 instead of the Traditional 學. I wonder that is a mistake or a purposeful choice. Moreover, I really wonder why the Traditional-and-Simplified character 選 in 會庭文選 was written differently in the photo. Is that an instance of the Vietnamese version of Han characters?

An Vinh
An Vinh
Reply to  leminhkhai
9 years ago

What I mean is exactly “variant” (I should use “Vietnamese variant” in my first comment).
After researching a little bit, I’m pretty sure that variant of 選 is at least not Chinese. Moreover, it seems that Unicode doesn’t have that glyph, which strengthens the possibility that it’s an obsolete, Vietnamese-varied glyph.
Maybe it’s just a result of using another script (cursive or semi-cursive change characters a lot). If so, because that script seems very neat, it still has a high chance to reflect somewhat-standard ways of writing Han characters in Vietnam at that time.
Again, it’s irrelevant to the post, and it might also be irrelevant in general. But, just for academic purposes, I think those Vietnamese variants still need to be studied thoroughly. I wonder if those studies already exists.

Thanh Pham
Thanh Pham
9 years ago

Thank you for writing this post. It was very informative and an interesting read. Is that first image a picture of cu Pham quang San?